Monday, November 2, 2009

imitation as flattery? or something more?

I'm asking a sincere question based on a recent show I went to, and from the perspective of another performer. A week ago or so, I went to see my friends' show, Brotherhood of the Jug band Blues, at the Jalopy Theater in Brooklyn. His band put on a fun show to celebrate a cd release, and a good time was had by all!
Before they played, however, a band called, "the Dough Rollers" played, and though their sound was good (meaning they were skilled musicians), I got a bad feeling watching them, a bit of unease. Check out the video on their Myspace page and then read on.
Now, I should preface my comments by saying that after they were introduced, the main singer said a quick word of thanks in the sort of voice you'd expect a young, 20 something to have: no growl, no whisky soaked raspy timbre, no accent. He sounded fresh from Connecticut or something, and seemed very sweet. I must also stress that I think what he, and his band are doing, is from a sincere love of the music, which is important to note.
I watched them, was surprised when he sang like an old world weary black blues man. I say black man, as opposed to simply, old man, because he is singing songs from the catalogues of black blues men from the early 20th century or thereabouts. I thought they did a good job, and was simply amused, until I tried to imagine them performing in Harlem. I tried to imagine how I would feel if I were an African american, and watched this. Would I be impressed? or insulted?
Now, I have sung my share of covers. I've sung many genres, and have NO problem with people singing someone else's music. I have no problem with people singing in other languages which aren't theirs, styles they didn't grow up with, music written a hundred, or heck, a thousand years before they were born. White people have performed music written by African americans, and vice versa-this is not my issue. My problem, is that one should perform these songs honestly. With their OWN voice. I've sung Aretha Franklin tunes-I tried to sound strong, as she sang them, but I still sang them in my voice. I've sung "Summertime", and "Can't help Lovin that man", but as me. I would feel differently if he was a character in a play perhaps, but he's presenting this as his style.
On the flip side, here's a white man singing an old appalachian dirge which was used in the soundtrack of "O brother where art thou". Now, that's believable! That's clearly his voice. What a song, and what a difference!
There's got to be some kind of difference between trying to get to the essence of a sound, and interpreting a song, and imitating, or impersonating, an artist. I've done both, and I would hope someone would call me out on it, if I seemed to be so affected, as to be mimicking. In my early 20's I certainly did too much of trying to sound like others, in a way to learn how they made their sounds, and grow my "repertoire" of sounds in my own voice. But for a while, I forgot what I sounded like when I wasn't trying to imitate another person, and it took a long time to see what I could create more authentically on my own.
I'll sing, influences and all, whatever seems to fit the tone of the music and lyrics best, and what feels right to me, limited only by what my vocal cords can do. This is all personal, and preferential-what sounds good to me, doesn't sound good to everyone, but it's mine. Changing, growing, but mine. Can Malcolm say the same? Is that how he sang as a kid? Is that what his voice naturally does with ease, or -OR-is he mimicking the people he loves? Is this offensive? Is it really not?
What do you think? am I overreacting? being too sensitive?
I'm really torn here-not sure why it affects me so. I want to like these kids-but it feels kinda wrong.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Kangaroos need to get hopping!


ok, it's been a long time, and I've had nothing really to say. I keep listening to my favorite Compassionate Cooks' podcast, and figure she explains everything better than I could, so I'll just send along her link every now and then, and you'll get all the info you could ever need on vegan issues. Two recent ones I loved were about Native blessing of meat (very interesting take on this popular argument), and " diseases of civilization"-eating to prevent illness and such. Both quite informative podcasts, an very thought provoking. I highly recommend them. 
However, I just had to say something about a "story" I saw on Yahoo. It seems that the Australian answer to global warming is to eat camels and kangaroos. I am not kidding.
They feel since sheep and cows emit a lot of methane, and take up a lot of space, as well as the fact that kangaroos are overabundant lately, people should just go back to eating them.
Ok two things: first off, according to one site, the reason kangaroos are running rampant is that fencing was put up to keep dingos from eating sheep-side note: neither sheep or dingos are native to Australia, but brought by people-which in turn, prevented predators of kangaroos getting to them as well.  So again, we cause these problems, and are willing to do MORE harm to "fix" it. I learned this in the same article about a protest over the use of the roos for Adidas sneakers. ick. For more, read here. Or here.-though that last site had a lot of dumb arguments too-but anyway....
Second: How would this help? If demand goes up, there is profit to be made. This means keeping the population up, adding to the problem.  Where would the incentive be then to look at alternatives, like sterilization?  
In other places, overpopulation of animals can be subsided a bit by catching, sterilizing, and then releasing large  numbers of animals. Yes, this might be expensive, but far more humane, and effective.  
Also, I would argue that simply adding another meat to the menu won't curb anyones' taste for cow and sheep flesh. Sadly, when I ate steak, I also ate chicken, and fish, and an occasional duck..I ate everything! I never thought :'oh, I've had my animal quota for the week, so I'll pass on that tonight'. Not once. If anything, you develop a taste for it and eat more. So that's just  a bad argument. 
What about going veg? Would it kill people to simply not eat the cows and sheep either? All that land (which is used for the grazing etc) could be used for crops. or trees. or animal rescues. or people rescues! I don't discriminate, I'll help people too!)-Orrrrrrrrrrr
!gasp! you could just let it be-let nature take over and do her thing-
Nah, clearly crazy talk.
Anyway, why can't more people (read:columnists) even fathom this as a good suggestion?  It's no longer a difficult choice for most people (ie;it's accessible and diverse foods are easier than ever to prepare and find), and would just be kinder overall-to the planet, the Roos, the cows, the sheep, your digestive tract......etc...worth looking into I'd say. 
Well, I'm off, and I didn't even get to the poor camels.....maybe next time.
thanks for reading. Oh! and boycott Adidas! I mean really-blech.
Happy New Year!! and peace to all.
-LeAnne